Issue Date
1941-10-10
Volume
3
Issue Number
20
Plaintext
m
o
• iiM
• Wi
;4BERSJp^
OFFICIAL 0K6AN OF THE ATLANTIC AND GULF DISTRICT,
SEAFARERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA
=i.
VOL, III MO NEW YORK, N. Y., FRIDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1941 No. 20
BOOST BONUS TO $80; $100 FOR SUEZ
Marine Cooks
Revolt; Appeal
To NMU Ran1(S
SAN PEDRO,—After de
feating the move to clamp
them into the stranglehold of
the top officialdom of the Na
tional Maritime Union by
defeating affiliation to the
NMU overwhelmingly in their
recent referendum, the mem
bership of the Marine Cooks
and Stewards of the Pacific
are now in open , revolt
against their own Communist
Partydominated officials and
taking steps for their recall
from office. At the same
l^e, the rank and file of the
Union stresses that it opposes
only the phoney "Unit^' of
Civran, Cayton and Co., but
desires to weld genuine bro;
therhood with the rank and
file of the N.M.U.
In the first issue of their new
paper, "VOTCTO OF THE MEM
BERSHIP", the Marine Cooks
carry an Open Letter to the NMU
Rank and File wnleh expresses
their genuine sentinient. The let
ter reads as follows:
. Letter to NMU Ranks
Sept. 12, 1941.
Dear Brothers:
We extend to you on this, our
first Issue, open greetings and
salutations. Now that we have
established a paper of, and for,
the rank and file mmebers of the
{Continued.on Page 2)
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
DEFENSE MEDIATION BOARD
The following is the official report of the recommendations
made by the National Defense Mediation Board in the bonus beef.
At special meetings this week, the membership of the Seafarers'
International Union up and down the coast is voting on these
recommendations. The alterative proposal, submitted by the Board
as a sort of ULTIMATUM in case the recommendations listed be
low were not accepted, is printed elsewhere in this issue under
the heading "BOARD'S ALTERNATE PROPOSAL."
• • • •
In the Matter of
AMERICAN MERCHANT MARINE INSTITUTE, INC.
rAClFTC AMERICAN SHIP OWNERS ASSOCIATION,
WATERMAN STEAMSHIP CORPORATION
SEAFARERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA
and
SAILORS' UNION OF THE PACIFIC — AFL.
The di*islon of the Board which heard this case was composed
of Charles E. WyzSnski, Jr., representing the public; George H.
Mead, representing employers, and Robert J. Watt, represeuting
employees.
Hearings were held on September 29 and on October 1, 2, 3
and 4, 1941.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Crews on American vessels sailing to foreign ports perform
an essential role in the national defense effort. Sound relationships
between representatives of these crews and owners of these vessels
are of great consequence to the nation.
2. The Seas Shipping Company, Inc., The Calmar Steamship
Corporation, the South Atlantic Steamship Company, and the Alcoa
Steamship Company, Inc., on the East Coast are associated jn the
American Merchant Marine Institute, Inc. Most of the owners on
the West Coast are associated in the Pacific American Shipowners
Association. The Waterman Steamship Corporation is not affiliated
with either group.
3. The unlicensed personnel before the National Defense Media
tion Board are represented by Seatarers' International Union of
North America and Sailors Union of Pacific.
(The licensed personnel are represented fy other unions. Their
problem is not dealt with here.)
4. Collective bargaining relationships have been established by
most of these owners with one or the other of these unions. In most
cases, collective bargaining contracts now exist or have just ex
pired. For the negotiation of such general contracts the parties
have worked out among themselves appppriate methods. These
methods usually include the parties requesting the United States
Department of Labor to station a Commissioner of Conciliation as
(Continued on Page 4)
Buchanan Crew Tells How
• Nazis Bombed Ship at Suez
Suppressed by the censors and up to the present unmen.
tioned in the daily press of this country is the dramatic story
of t/je bottibing by Nazi raiders of the S.S. PRESIDENT
BUCHANAN, manned by a Sailors Union of the Pecific crew.
A firsthand account of this attack and the dangers and
hardships Undergone by'the seamen of the BUCHANAN was
obtained only this week by the" Seafarer' Log from crew
members as the ship docked in New York.
The only previous mention
of the jaid on the BUOHA
• NAN was a reference in a re
cent issue of the American
Magazine. The rest of the
publications, including the
daily newspapers, saw fit to
leave unpublished this piece
of news vital to the seamen
out to get a just increase in
the war bonus.
Just Spectators
Here is the story as told to us
by sever/il members of the BU
CKANAN S crew.
".We ^rived . iu. Sues on Tues
day, July 8th and were lying at
anchor near Attica, near the Army
camp on the furthest end of the
bay. We experienced several air
raids after our arrival, in which
we just looke'd on more or less as
spectators, watching bombs fall
on the canal and on Port Tuflk
and the sputtering reply of anti
aircraft guns shooting at targets
sought out by a powerful display
of searchlights in the sky.
First Jolt
"On Sunday evening, July 13th,
with most of the crew aboard,
air raid sirens shrieked a warn
(Continitea on Page 3)
MASS LAUNCHING
OF NEW SHIPS
The greatest mass launching in
recent years oecured on Septem
ber 27th when fourteen vessels
slid off the ways in east and west
eoaet shipyards. The mass launch
ings brought the number of ships
built under the auspices of the
Maritime Commission to a total
of 104.
Among the ships launched was
the S.S. Alcoa Polaris, which will
be manned by a SIU crew.
SUPPORT FROM SEA
^
NDMI^ imposes Compromise;
Union Forced to Accept Under
fhreat of New Ultimatum
Faced with a virtual ultimatum to accept a
compromise on the bonus issue or else be sub
jected to an attack against the Union's existence
by an array of opponents including the highest
Government agencies and officials, representa
tives of the Seafarers' International Union
agreed this week to submit to the membersliip
recommendations of the National Defense Medi
ation Board for acceptance.
DEMANDS AND CONCESSIONS
Although they grant a 33V3% increase in the bonus, and
other concessions to the S.I.U., the recommendations do not
include a bonus for the West Indies or other Caribbean runs,
which the Union had among its chief demands. The increases
granted are far from satisfactory to the seamen. No increase
in war risk insurance is included. In addition, the recom
mendations include a stipulation that present arrangements
are to remain in force for one year and that during this
time all disputes are to he submitted to conciliation and
mediation machinery set up by the Government, without the
Union resorting to strike action on the bonus question.
On the panel which handed
down these recommendations
and the "alternative" was
Robert J. AVatt, a leader of
the American Federation of
Labor, who together with the
two other Board members,
urged acceptance "in the in
terests of National Defense."
What the S.I.U. Won
Although the decision of the
Board is far from a complete vic
tory for the Union, the SIU has
won a number of rounds in this
battle.
1. The finlcy Maritime Commis
sion remains out of the picture in
all disputes on this issue, present
or future. That is a terrible blow
to the shipowners and their tools
and a permanent' gain for the
Union.
Phoney Schemes Blasted
2. The shipoumers' vicious
scheme of tying the uar bonus
to the hull insurance rate—a
scheme which would have made
honue raises virtually impossible,
since hull rates as a whole fluc-
tuate but little—has been com-
Support H.R.5446
Bill for Seamen's
Jobless Insurance
While In Washington for the
Bonus Beef hearings, S.I.U. and
S.U.P. representatives also ap
peared before the House Com
mittee on Merchant Marine and
Fisheries to support H.R. 5446, a
bill to give unemployment insur
ance to m^ercharit seamen, who
have been excluded from sue*
government benefits up to the
present. Brothers Lundeberg
and Hawk spoke at length and
urged passage of the bill, which
would end this discrimination
against the men who sail the
ships.
rh his report to the member
ship, SecretaryTreasurer Hawk
has urged the membership to
(Uontinued on Page 4)
The sentiment of the S.I.U.
crews on the high seas could not
be polled during the bonus beef.
But how they felt is indicated by
the following cable received in
the Union office on OCTOBER 4,
1941 from the boys on the S.S.
Shickshinny:
SANSORIGINE NIL NIL
DLT HAWKS SEAFARERS
INTERNATIONAL UNION
NEW YORK CITY
WE HAVE FULL KNOWL
EDGE OF MEMBERSHIPS EF
FORTS AND ARE BEHIND
YOU ONE HUNDRED PER
CENT. IF POSSIBLE WIRE
COLLECT RESULTS.
PHILIPS
FOR CREW SHICKSHINNY
Unfortunately, we couldn't wire
them the results since the loca
tion of the ship in the cable is
given as "SANSORIGINE NIL
NIL", which in cable language
means: "The place and date the
cable was sent from can't be
given because of censorship."
But their feelings were un
doubtedly shared by all the
S.I.U. iVien on the high seas,
whom censorship did not prevent
from hearing of our, beef.
(Continued on Page 2)
Money Due
CREW OF S.S.
ALCOA BANNER
Ail members of the crew of
the S.S. Alcoa Banner, who
were paid off in New York
after the last trip in Septem
ber, are entitled to money due
them on the Explosive Bonus.
This money can be collected
by each seaman upon identifi
cation at the company offices,
17 Battery Place, N. Y.
t A
,1
f'S:
r
' f
• P
http://www.pdfcompressor.org/buy.html
E.r ';.>'^,;7^'.3*.
TJH E SEAFARERS' LOG Erid^y, October ]ifl, 1941
I .'.
=s:'
I S
I''' "•
' i..
r^,
W
I!:
«• ;'
Published by tne
ATLANTIC & GllLF WSTMCT
' ' of the
Seqfarers* intemqtiqnal Union
of North Americd
Affiliated with the American Federation of Labor
HARRY LUNDEBERQ, Acting International President
110 Market Street, Room 402, San Francisco, Calif.
V I . r
ADDREaa ALL CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING THIS
T PUBLICATION TO:
"THE SEAFARERS' LOG" ^
P. O. Box 25, Station P, New York, N. Y.
Phone: BOwIing Green 93437
Defense Board Decision;
5 A Raw Deal
If. •
Tt would be just fooling ourselves to stress the gains con
ceded to tlie ITiiibn by the Xational Defense Mediation Board
decision in the bonus beef — to say that the Seafarer's' In
ternational Union has come out of the Board hearings with
a'big victory.
Gains there were, to he sure. After the militant and tena
cious fight made by the seamen against the shipowners and
the finky Maritime Comiuissioii during the strike, tlie De
fense Board would have been hardput not to make the num
ber of eoneoHsions it did make The seamen won them in the
first round of a battle ni which they fought unflinchingly.
A DANGEROUS tREND
But the concessions that' Mere refused the S.I.U. by the
Board and the manner in Avhich the Board's panel neted in
the case are cauSe for grave Concefii arid Serious reflection
to all unionconscious seamen.
The seamen fought the Maritime"Commission to a stand
still. Involved in that fight as a foremost i.ssue was the ques
tion of a war bonus for the Carrihean or West Indies run.
Most affected in thii^ question was the Alcoa Steamship Com
pany, the shipping subsidiary of the poAverful Aluminum
monopoly.
The Commission Avent to the extent of. open ami undis
guised scabherding in order to protect Alcoa from the S.T.U.
demand. The S.I.U. stood its ground ami the Commission
passed out of the picture. • '
The dispute then goes to the Defense Board and this sec^
ond government agency is no less a'starincli defender of
Alcoa against the seamen than the Commission Avas! The
N.D.M.B. also refuses to graut a bonus in the West Indies
run! It refuses this demand and dbesn't eA^en bother t'o ex
plain Avhy!
After such an experience, the seamen have not only the
right but the duty to Avonder Avho it is that is running the
government. We knoAV that "Banana" Eobson runs a vital
section of the Maritime Commission. Does Alcoa, do the
monOpolist.s, run the other vital machinery in all the other
government agencies? What has become of what A\'as oiice
proclaimed as a government of the people, by the people and
for the people?
WHO PROTECTS LABOR?
Another thing that puzzles the seamen and that they have
a right to be concerned about^ On the panel Avhieh handled
tlie di.spiite. Avhich Ava's so solicitous about Alcoa not having
to pay a West Iridies bonus. Avhich Avas so tough in threaten
ing the .seamen with compulsorj' arbitration, sat Robert J.
Watt, a leader of the American Federation of Labor, arid
presumably Labor's representative on the board. HOAV could
a man like that go along Avith such moves that clearly take
the side of the employers? Does the American Federation
of Labor approve such a .stand on the paft of one of its oilt
'stariding representatives? Isn't it the job of an A.F' of L.
'?man'to see to it that Labor's side is given a fair chance on
i;hese government bodies? Does a pledge to support ,"Na
tional Defense" mean that the defense of Labor's rights has
to go by the AVay.shle ?
These are questions that the seamen must necessarily ask
'them.selves as a re.sult of their experiences in the bonus beef.
The S.I.U., faced with government threats arid with the lack
of cooperation from Labor's representative on the Board, had
no choice but to accept the urisatisfactbry recommendations
of the N.D.M.B. ^
It AA^as siMiply a matter of pre.serving the Union intact. It
.was simply a matter of taking a few gains in order to build
• the txrganizatiom"stronger for the future. • '
But/In brilldirig 'for the future, the seamen will not fbr
i^et the e'kpe'rieneb's of this beef. They will have to take into
abcoiirit, the lessons learned in this dispute knd make use
..them for future refeceriCC. ' ' '
V
Marine Cooks
Revolt;
XP
T» <NMtf Ranks
(Continued from Page 1)
West Coast Marine Cooks and
Stewards it will not'be difficult
for us to speak to you openly and
frankly.
The Afflliation Ballot that ends
today will andoubtetlly express
the desire of the greater majority
of ourmembers to remain inde
pendent of the National Maritime
Union. This, brothers, IS riot to
be interpreted as an insult to you
as Union men. Our position on
the question of affiliation is inde
pendent' of our opinion of you,
the rank and file of another
mhritime union.
Continued Support
In the' past AVe have' supported
your every struggle to organize,
giving you economic arid moral
support in your 1936 strike and
every cooperation in what Ave all
considered important legislative
activity. Those of you Avho came
to the West Coast to ship out
found lis extremeiy cooyemtlve
and only in cases where your
worst element disrupted our ships
did we find disciplinary action
necessary.
But you have permitted to rise
in your organization a p61itical
group that has acquired a stran
glehold on the NMU. Although
this group has contributed noth
ing to the militancy of your or
ganizapon, but on the contrary
committed you to a jiollcy of ap
peasing the shipowners and the
government on the most vital is
sues, nevertheless through plan
ned maneuvers it was able to
take over the organizational con
trol of the NMU. It is this group,
In its desperate drive for com
plete cdntfdl over the entire
Maritime Industry; that has
driven us into the "unity" ballot,
The "linlty" they wish us to
accept is not the real working
class unity of Marili^e workers
but the ' top fraction organiza
tional unity of the East and West
Coast politicians. We, no friore
than you, Wish to be dominated
alnd shdVed around by your offi
cials either ln fighting for condi
tions or determining trade union
policy.'
Their "Unity"
Quite ftankly tHeir record for
militancy is lousy and we don't
trust them. Ybut PILOT, jiist
like our own VOICE of the Fed
eration is being used by these,
people to beceive and betray you
into even gieater cbndesstDns to
the shipowners. Arid the war
mongering policy of the editorial
staff will riiean ever greater sac
rlflceis drii'^brir Part, even as you
have sailed ships to Vladivostok
for onefifth of the bonus df the
other west coast upiions.
Join Against Misleaders .
We could list' the innumerable
reasons why it Is necessary for
"both of us as maritime workers
to effect a clekr and effective
struggle against the reactionary
character of out leadership, their
rirdgrahi krid flleffr activity. Suf
fice If *to Hay that it 1s this
qUeBtibn of leadership that makes
Unity irii'iiosfeiblie for both Coasts.
It is tWfs qile^tlon rif leadership
that has kept yodr 'cdridftions eo
much lower than ouiri • arid pre
vented ycm from building your
union to the level of economic
coriditlons and onion 'militancy
that we have been able to achieve.
And even our own conditions
hav'e suffered for the last three
years because of the appeasing
"this is not the time" slogan of
fifEMMB Iniposes CQmprorriise;
{Continued from Page 1)
pletely defeated, iChe system of
bonus payriients Is ̂ d femalris on
a flat rate' basis.
3. The attempt of the shipown
ers to base bonus pay on a per
centage of toages—a "solution'
which they sold ta the licensed
riersonnel and which would have
the effect of breaking the solid
arity of the unlicensed rating on
this isaiie^bas similarly been
scotched^ Equal bonus pay, on a
flat rate, is to be paid each sea
man, whether he be bosun, ordin
ary, oiler, wiper, or messman,
, No "Freezing"
4. The shipowners' plan to
"frbeze" bonus pay for the dura
tion of the war has fizzled. Tlie
Board's decision specificaily rec
ognizes that the Union has the
right to ask for renewed increases
in bonus pay "if the present
situation is changed by an Act of
Congress, executive action, the
spfiead or contraction of the area
of hostilities . . . or the rise or
fan of sinkings of American ves
sels. .. ."
5. Mediation machinery has
been set up which eliminates the
pbssibilitiy of such delays as the
five months lost since last May
and the schemes of the shipown
ers to hamstring tiie Uriioii with
compulsory arbitration. Under the
Board recommendations, if after
five days after the Union gives
the companies written notice of a
d'eriiarid fot increased bonus pay,
an agreement has riot been
reached, the matter can immedi
ately be presented to the Division
of Conciliation of the U.S. De
partment of Labor. "If concilia
tion is not successful in one week
. . . the Director of the Division
may then refer the case to a
board composed of throe disinter
ested persons appointed by the
President of the United States,"
says the N.D.M.B. decision. Such
board shall have power to make
recommendations."
Retroactive Bonus
6. The increase in bonus pay—
from $60 to $80 per month and
froih $75 to $100 (plus $5 addi
tional for eacli day over five) for
the Port' of Suez—is effective on ̂
all ships as of August 16, 1041 at
the latest "or any earlier effective
date set by special rider.'* In
otiier words, the new bonus gains
are retroactive.
7. Most important, the ship-
dtvhers' dastardly conspiracy to
break ALL CONTRACTS with the
Union, on the fiimsy pretext that
the Union violated its agreement
when it refused to go in for ar-
bitration, has been squashed once
and for all. "Nothing in these
recommendations," says .the
Board decision, "shall be' inter-
preted so as to reduce benefits noAV
existing under collective bargain-
ing contracts. "Except as herein
modified, existing contracts and
arrangements shall continue."
ThaPs 'not only a blow at the con-
spiring shipowiiers, but at the
trtacUerous officials of the ~Na*
tional Maritime Union, who ioere
conspiring with them and hoping
to move in on the SIU ships once
the contracts of the Union were
declared void.
Pacing the Pacts
The Seafarers Internatidnal
Union , has thus Won some'highly
important decisions in this strug
gle. The SIU does not go In for/
the .fancy lying of the Staliuist
dominated officials of the NMU,
who call every setback they get
a gain and every defeat a victory.
The SIU faces the facts and
judges tliem soberly. The bonus
dispute has resulted in a decisipn
from the Defense Board which
the Union has to accept because
it has no better choice, given the
present circumstances. It is not
a triumph for the Union: far^,
from It. But it ddes mean a few
more rounds won against the
shipbwnei's and their stooges. It
does Show that the SIU can stand
its groithd. That's the 'best giiar
antee that it will survive the diffi
cult times aliead and win more'
rounds for the seamen In the bat
tle, which is itself far fiUhi 'fin
ished, and which the Union—
looking confidentially into the fu
ture—knows that it. can and Will
win in good time.
Seafarers' Log Honor Roll
R. Lindsay .$ 2.00
S.«. IPSWICH 9.50
L. Daray 1.00
S.S. ALCOA
PATHFINDER 24.3b
Anbriymous 1.00
James Bingham ,50
J. P. Shuler .50
George' Allen ... 10.00
iS.S. DELSUD 21.50
Ed Travers / 2,00
D. Malone ... 2.00
S.S. LASSALL'E
(Engine Dept.) 2.00
S.S. PONCE DE LEON .. 8.60
S.S. SANDWICH ........ 19.00
T. Varhon ' i, 1.00
S.S. MONROE 10.45
Aritfioriy Melewski 2.00
A Member 3.00
S.S. WEST liyjBODEN .. 21.00
S.S, ALCOA StilPPER .. 8.40
j. Anderson '... " Uso
S.S. CITY OF ALMA .... 59.06
J. Ganzhorn 5.00
G. Whitehurst :, 1:00
S.S. TOPA TOPA , 430
R. Blades 1.00
Joseph Delmonaco i;00
C. Johnson 1.00
• S.S. EVELYN
(Deck Dept 2,50
William Wandell ....r... liflO
S.S. CARABULLA. .. .n . 'i 10.88
S.S. ALCOA CARRIERS.. .,7.(50
C. Pope .......;.., "J i;po
Donations from Sah Pedfo 23;00
S.S. HILTON 6.50
J. Samardje I.OO
S.S. DELPLATA ........ 48.65
E. LIndsey .....V . i.po
E. Folsom V i;6o
J. Linn . 1.00
S.S. LAFAYETTE ....... "2330
A. WitufskI ............, vrdjab
C. Jackson ^,.1.... , 6.00
Total .; r$3BZ88
our leadership.
DOT Pig^^
In t'liese "riext moriths and
yeats "rif iVar cfiSi,4 and labor
frtrrigglea ririity BetWean both
'coasts iriupt be the actual fight to
riiaititain cbririltiohs arid tiraserve
tlur mibns. "We do not trust' the
fffSse'rit leadership of the; Mari
time Uriioii to' coriduct that right
iesblilteiy Or' effectively, rihat
fight is ours, as the rank and flile
membership of both, unions; a
cause that Is Coriitriori to all work
ers, maritime and otherwise, When
their conditions: anri their organi
zations are under attack.
In the ever developing struggle
against the encroachment 'of "tho
shipowners and reactionary legis'
lation you will find us with yoiri
fighting every inch of the' wriy.
We pledge yori our wholehiear^d
• support iri every (jidonbriiic' biri'd
political fight . . . we pledge yott'
the hard earned militaricy thkt
lias come to us through the great
strikes of '34 and '36. " ^
In apite of our reactioriary
leadership w'e pledge yOu the
unity that only worker s whose
livelihood ih earned by the sweat,
and the effort of thfeir la'bor can
feel. TWat tinffy can .riever he
Voted on , . . thaj unity 'can ria'ver
be destroyed'. . •
• .i
* , I
http://www.pdfcompressor.org/buy.html
J!
Friday, October f6,1941 THE SEAFARERS' LOG
i
hat's Do i njg—«
V'
NEW ORLEANS
Dear Sir and Brother:
The Maritrhie Commission Is
complaining about us tying the
ships up, but from the way the
Germans are sinking the ships
going out, they should thank us
for keeping thein tied to'the
docks, and away from the Nazi
submarine.
Some day in some place, may
be sopn, maybe years from now,
we may get a newspaper to print
our side of the story. As we pick
up the papers today we see where
we are unpatriotic Americans,
communists, and other high
handed phrases the capitalist
owned press and Maritime Com
mission can think up. We see
where we are stabbing our fellow
Americans in the back because we
are tying up National Defense.
But yet we never see where we,
the seamen, who risk Our lives to
keep other nations alive and give
them the things it takes to carry
on the war against the one who
really threatens us, get one bit of
praise or support from the paperfe
or any government agency.
This morning we see in the pa
pers and hear on the radio where
they have appropriated another 8
billion or so dollars for lease
lertd. Yes, brother, arodnd 8 bil
lion dollars for Eiifgland, France
and \vhat have you.' We, the sea
men are the ones that will have
to sail the ships that bring the
majority of the leaselend prod
Ucts to the .other countries. No,
brothers, not. the men who have
that money. They will never haVe
to leave their "dollarayear"
($25.00 a day expense) jobs to
sail these ships across the seas
and into the v.ar zones. They
have appropriated this money for
the other countries, but where is
the money for their own Ameri
can seamen who are out on strike
for a decent war bonus? No, bro
thers, not one led cent for us!
We don't rate it as far as theV
are concerned.
The M.C. made great plans,
how they would take every ship
the SItr struck and sail it with
iHhks. It made these plans and
threats and put it in the papers,
the same, papers the seamen
couldn't beg, borrow or steal a
column in, to give their side of
the story.
But yet with ali their plans and
false propaganda we won the first
inning.
Y'es, brothe..i, we have built a
damn gbdd ball team. We are win
ning out, playing against great
odd's, Mr. Shipowner & the M.C.
Let's keep our score high. Let's
prove to them that we mean busi
ness: prove to them that we
should come first, as American
Citizens and American Seamen.
Brothers, in closing I want to say,
that if we keep our chins up like
we did during the strike, we
can't' lose.
Fraternally yours,
C. J. ''Buck" Stephens,
New Orleans, Engine, Pat.
PROVIDENCE
I'he following is a letter in re-
ply to an anti-labor blast in the
employer-run press.
Sept. 25, 1941.
Editor
Pawtucket Times
Pawtucket, R. I.
Dear Sir:
In your editorial published in
the September 24th issue of the
Pawtucket Times you state that
the strike calied by the Seafarars'
International Union "An unjus
tified strike because it is a strike
against the public safety," You
refer to the bonus asked by the
Seafarers' International' Union
for sliips' crews entering war
zones.
A • an Editor, Sir, will you
kindly explain to me and the pub
lic your experience and qualifica
tions as a seafarer? Do you ap
preciate the hazards and hard
ships that a member of the S.I.U
undergoes, as well as the worry
and uncertainty of the members
of his family whom he leaves be
hind, when he performs his duties
in these troubled times? As yoii
know, several American ships
have already been sunk and even
Wins Right fo
The Aluminum Company of. America is out to defend its
glutted hankroll, hot only against seamen who ask a decent
wage for sailing its .ships, but also against the United States
Government who, since 1937, has been trying to break the
monopoly's dpathrgrip upon the country'.s supply of alu
minum. ^ ~
ti
Alcoa lost its first round to the
seanien (when its stooge Mari
time Commission 'Was eliniinated
from bonus hegotiatlons), but
thib Week it/Won the first round
of its fiflht with the government.
Federal Judge Francis G. Coffey
'rehderecf a decision which de
fied, In, all eesen'^tlar 'reflects,
the four and oneha f Vear did
government suit to break up the
Atuminum trust, uiider fhe Sher
W.n.ant'4r,d8t'iaWs.
Judge Coffey's involved and le
.galistic reasoning will permU iVl
qoa to continue to corner all raW
Materials and plantfacilities fhr'
thp production of the yaluablei
metal, if will continue to set;
prices, arid conditions of sale apdi
prevent expansion of productoin
facilities by competitors, In .short,
Alpoa will be able to continue its'
selfseeking sabotage of "defense"
efforts by restricting the amount
of aluminum produced for the
building of war planes.
Even as fhe longwinded Judge
began a three day reading of his
opinion, a Senate investigating
committee in Washington was un
covering additional hairraising
facts dn Alcoa's antidemocratic
maneuvers. .
As usual, these reyelatldns
were ignored by the eniployer-
dpminated press ( Alcoa does a lot
of advertising), But The Nation,
a liberal weeltly magazine Which
does not depend upon advertising
for its existence, did publish a
story written hr I. P. Stone. "The
(Continued on Page 4)
the most romantic optimist could
not dare hope that more ships
will not be sunk. It is fortunate,
"fndeed, that up to the present, no
American lives have been lost.
Your attempt to belittle our claim
on the ground that the West In
dies waters have not been de
clared by our Government Iq be
a part of the war zone yet. Your
article refers to "waters in which
there may be some risk even
though they are not actually in
eluded in the area defined as war
zones." What do you call being
torpedoed—just going for a swim?
Is there no risk in being sunk
and put adrift in a. lifeboat for
God knows how many days, with
possibly no chance of taking food
and water in the lifeboat with
you? Then what is your idea pf
risk?
You say that the United States
Maritime Commission has been
ready^ to engage in, a study of
war bonus? Why have they then
repeatedly told the steamship
companies not to give a war bo
HUB? The "Maritime Commission
has never, at any time, been
ready to aid or help the unions
in any trouble, be it on condi
tions of better living or workin
conditions, in other than its own
selfish way, of doing business.
It is true that our President
did not declare the West Indies
a war zone, but sea "raiders know
no boundaries. Af the same time
the issue is not confined to the
waters of the West Indies. Con
sider those ships entering the
ports of British Africa and the
Red Sea. Such ships may easily
becume the piey uf raiders.
You further state that' tire
union leader's were not willing to
wait—in Other words, not to
strike. We, in the S.I.U. gave the
steamship owners plenty of tinie
to meet our demands. But' no.
They would not listen to arty de
mand in reason from us. But the
Maritime Commission and the
shipowners did meet behind
closed doors with the licensed offi
cers of the deck and engine de
partments and granted their de
mands, disregarding the S.I.U.,
which is the representative of the
seamen in general. These sea
men, who really carry the brunt
of the work, were left out in the
cold. However, the. latest informa
tion to come to the attention of.
this office in Providence, is that
.the matter has been taken from,
the hands of the Maritime Com
mission and that the bonus dis
pute has been certified to the Na
tional Defense Mediation . Board
by the Secretary of Labor inline
with President Roosevelt's Proc
lamation of May 27, 1941.
Now, Mr. Editor, I hope that
you will please let the public iu
general see this letter and just
read what the score really is on
this war bonus strike.
'•
. SEAFARERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION' :
OF NORTH AMERICA ^
Atlantic & Gulf District |
/ i
SecretaryTreasurer's Office
Room 213 — 2 Stone Street, New York City
P. O. Box 25, Station P Phone: BOwling Green 93437
DIRECTORY OF BRANCHES
BRANCH
NEW YORK
BOSTON
PROVIDENCE .
BAGTIMORB ..
PHILADELPHIA
NORFOLK
NEW ORLEANS
SAVANNAH ...
JACKSONVILLE
TAMPA
MOBILE
TEXAS CITY ..
MIAMI
SAN JUAN
ADDRESS
,.2 Stone St.
Dispatcher's OfiBee .,
. 330 Atlantic Ave. ...
. 465 South Main St. .
. 14 North Gay St. ..,
,6 North 6th St
. 25 Commercial PI. ..
309 Chartres St. ....
. 218 East Bay St. ...,
.136 East Bay St. ....
. 206 So. Franklin St. ,
. 56 So. Conception St.
. 105 4th St., N.
.1348 N.E. First Ave..
. 8 Covadonga St
PHONE
BOwling Green 93437
BOwling Green 93430
LIBerty 4057
Manning 3572
Calvert 4539
Lombard 7651
Norfolk 41083
MAgnolia 3962
Savannah 31728
Jacksonville 61791
Tampa M1323
Dexter 1449
Texas City 722
Miami 22950
San Juan 1886
Buchanan Crew TeHs Mow
Nazis Bombed Ship at Suez
Sincerely yours,
Joseph E. Lgpham,
Providence Agent of the
Seafarers' Int. Uhloin
NOTICE!
EDWARp DUPUY
• Please get in tpucii wjth
I,iOcal Board No. 14,
New Orleans, La.
A. A. SAULS, G223
Get in touch with" your a^nt
Mrs. W. M, Sauls, Bpx 114,
Ridgeland, S.C., immediately.
(Continued from Page 1)
ing. Most of the seamen aboard
the BUCHANAN were asleep in
their bunks and didn't pay
much attention to it. Suddenly,
at 2 o'clock in the morning, I
was shaken in my own bunk and
the ship seemed to have under
gone a severe shock.
"We rushed out on deck to find
out what was the matter. The
first thing we heard was the pop
ping off of a tug tied to the stern
of the ship. The native long
shoremen were rushing around in
all directions, jumping into
barges and doing their best to get
clear of the ship in a hurry.
Under Fire
"We discovered that a bomb
had landed a few feet astern of
the ship, which had caused the
percussion we felt in the foc'si.
Most of the crew assembled
around the square of the prome
nade deck outside the sailors'
quarters. We could no longer re
tain the calm bearing of mere
onlookers. We felt that wi were
under fire. I don't hesitate to
say that my heart was practical
ly in my throat at that moment.
All of the crew had similar feel
ings.
Another Blast
"While we were discussing this
first blast, in the excitement we
suddenly heard the roar of a plane
diving for the ship and soon the
shrill whistle of a .falling bomb
followed. We made for the alley
ways leading to our quarters in
an attempt to get off the open
deck. With a sigh of relief we
heard a bomb detonating in the
water about 20 yards on the port
side.
"Once again, this time cau
tiously we came out in the open
square to see what had happen
ed. There, across the bay, we
saw a hiigc burst of flame shoot
ing up from the deck of a ship.
S,S, Georgic Ablazed
"A Soldier nearby shouted ex
citedly; 'What's I'he position of
the GEORGIC!' The next day we
found out that it was the 28,000
ton S.S. Georgic, but Ive never
couldf' discover how many people
had been killed In the raid. We
watched her for a while and saw
her blazing hulk being towed
through the water to get her out
of reach of otlier ships.
"After this incident we needed
no further convincing as to our
ships being aiftually subject to de
struction by the Axis raiders.
Third Bombing
"As we were watching the
GEORGIC In her agony of fire.
the plane zoomed down upon us
again and we rushed for cover
once more. Another bomb went
off in a deafening loar, this time
on the starboard side. We waited
up for a while and when we heard
the sound of the 'AllClear' sig
nal. we went back to sleep.
Damage Surveyed
"The next morning we sur
veyed the damage. The sanitary
lines were broken down. Pipes
and pumps were out of order.
Several of the radiators had been
torn from the wall. The concus
sion from the first bomb had
ripped off a ventilator on the
poop deck. Two longshoremen
had been killed as they Jumped
off the ship to seek safety. The
remaining longshoremen had left
the ship and taken to the hills
where they dwell. Cargo was
not being worked.
Lack of Precautions
"We attributed the attack to
the fact that the BUCHANAN, be
ing a former passenger sliip, liad
its huge midship houses painted
white which showed up as a per
fect target in the moonlight.
Nevertheless, even after this at
tack, although tlie midship houses
were covered with canvas as a
measure of precaution, a barge
full of white floursacks was tied
up alongside jof us, making us as
much of a target as before.
"Two other Amerioan ships
were close by. One was the S;S.
Montanan, also manned by an
SUP Crew and the S.S. Knoxville
City, an Isthmian Line ship. Tliey
were sparea our experience, but
tlie Montanan got a warm recep
tion, as if had just arrived.
Back Bonus Beef
"The next few days, before we
pulled out, were days in which
we lived in expectancy of further
bombings. The port was in the
grip of tetuor."
When asked how the BUCHA
NAN boys felt about the war
bonus, they declared:
"After this trip, we feel that
they value our lives damn cheap
if they think that $60 a month
and $75 for e^atry ir»to Suez, can
even begin to compensate sea
men for putting up with tKe
Nazi bombings, let alone all the
other untold hardships that we
have to go through on a trip like
this. You can be sure that we
were all behind your strike 100
per cent. We're ready to back
the demands for higher bonds
and war risk insurance to the
lir it, And Vwe'ye flot this horri
ble experience in Suez to back
us up in this just demand."
I ^1
• j.
B
iy.
' 1
i V:. 1
'"ii
tsl
I r "• * J
11
• A
.['.J''.'
•
http://www.pdfcompressor.org/buy.html
• .;'v FWr
. •
• Jpfev • • •
f;F,F
y •
• ,'F^' <• .
"lijiji 4.
THE SEAFARERS' LOG
' '''^ Vli Friday, October 10. 1941
HQBE ABOUT;
RECOMMENDATIGNS OF THE
DEFENSE MEDIATION SOARD
{Continued from Page 1)
an observer and mediator at the collective bargaining negotiations.
These recommendations do not affect those methods or any unex
pired contracts.
5. However, a special problem arises From the risk run by men
"Who go to sea in time of war. This problem has not been solved
by the existing or contemplated contracts. It is with this problem
that these recommendations are concerned.
6. The first pait of this problem is to provide for bonuses for
war risk which will be fair under present conditions, The second
part of this problem is to provide machinery for making equitable
future adjustments if conditions change.
7. To meet the first part of the problem, the National Defense
Mediation Board recommends that until changed, as provided in
paragraph 8. the following war bonus rules shall govern those who
become signatory to these recommendations:
a. There shall be five war risk areas, namely:
1. TransAtlantic voyages to Spain, Portugal; East, South or West
Coasts of Africa, Red Sea, Persian Gulf, India, Iceland and Green
land. (Whole voyage; except that if any vessel continues east
bound to United States ports via India and the Pacific Ocean said
bonus rates for such area will continue until the vessel passes
the 180th Meridian, eastbound, and thereafter no further bonuses
will be payable.)
2. TransAtlantic voyages to Russia (Archangel, etc.) (Whole
voyage)
3. TransPacific voyages to Japan, Philippine Islands, China, Indo
China, East Indies, Malayan Peninsula. (After crossing the J80th
Meridian westbound, until recrossing the same Meridian east
bound.)
4. TransPacific voyages to New Zealand or Australia. (From ar
rival of vessel in Suva or the crossing of the 180th Meridian,
westbound, until departure from Suva or crossing the 180th
Meridian eastbound.)
5. Canada (Atlantic Coast.) (While vessel is north of 35 degrees
of north latitude when bound to or from a Canadian port.)
b. An ablebodied seaman shall be paid a war risk bonus at the
rate of $80 a month in the first four areas and $33 in the fifth area.
Other unlicensed personnel shall be paid the same bonus.
c. There shall be paid to ablebodied seamen in addition to the
area bonus just provided, the following port bonuses:
1. For the port of Suez, or any other port which is subject to regu
lar bombing, $100, plus $5 per day for each day beydnd five days
that the vessel is in that port.
:2. For any port Jn the Red Sea or in the Persian Gulf not covered
by paragraph (1) Supra. $45.The same bonuses shall be paid
other unlicensed personnel. The Board makes no recommendation
as to port bonuses for Vladivostok or ports in Iceland.
8. To meet the second part of the problem, the National De
fense Mediation Board recommends that the following machinery
for making equitable future adjustments shall govern those who
become signatory to these recommendations:
a. Any signatory may ask for a change, an addition to, or sub
traction from the present war bonus rules set forth above if the
present situation is changed by an act of Congress, executive action,
the spread or contraction of the area of hostilities in the Eastern
pr Western hemispheres, the entry into the war or withdrawal from
the war of belligerents, or the rise or fall of sinkings of American
vessels. Such proposed change shall be limited to the areas where
conditions are alleged to have changed.
b. The signatory asking for the change shall present his request
In writing to the party from whom the change is sought. (Meetings
shall occur at once.) If agreement betweeq them is not reached
one week after the request is presented, either party may present the
matter to the United States Department of Labor Division of Con
ciliation for conciliation. If conciliation is not successful in one week
after the matter was presented to the Division of Conciliation, the
Director of the Division may then refer the case to a board composed
of three disinterested persons to be appointed by the President of
The United States. Such Board shall have power to make recommen
^iations.
9. The recommendations in paragraph (8) shall be effective until
November 1, 1943. I'aragraph (7) shall be effective until November
1, 1.942, During the period of these recommendations there shall be
in connection with and on account of war bonus issues, no lockout,
slowdown, or like action by either owners or men represented by
• fSose who become signatdrfea to these recommendations.
10. Nothing in these recommendations shall be Interpreted so
as to reduce benefits now existing under collective bargaining con
tracts. Except as herein modified existing contracts and arrangements
shall continue.
1. These recommendations shall become effective upon all ships
which sailed on or before August 16, 1941 or any earlier effective
date set by special rider. i
12. If any dispute arises as to the interpretation of these recom
mendations, and if the parties cannot adjust that dispute by collec
tive bargaining, either party may refer it to the Division of Con
ciliation for conciliation, and, if conciliation fails, either party may
refer it' to the threeman board referred to in paragraph (8) for
;lnterpretation.
NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDIATION BOARD
By Cliarles B. Wyzanski, Jr., George H. Mead, Roberb J. Watt
The representatives of the Seafarers' International Union of
North America, Atlantic and Gulf District, though not fully In ac
cord with the recommendations, agree to carry back these recom
mendations to the Union's membership and to explain to the mem
• bership the circumstances as to why it is to the Union's interest
to accept these recommendations and explain to them their respon
sibility in connection with these recommendations.
SEAFARERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OP NORTH AMERipA
«y John Hawk. M. D. Biggs, Howard Guinier, Sydney Gretcher
More About r
Alcoa Privileged
To Sabotage
(Continued from Page 3)
title of Stone's article was "Mak
ing Defense Safe for Alcqp."
The government had long
planned to expand aluminum pro
duction by Federal financing of
plant facilities. This program was
entrusted to one of those phoney
"$peryear" men, and Stone re
veals how he did the job up
brown!
Arthur h. Bunker, of 0PM, was
the man given the task of battling
the Aluminum trust. This was
about as sensible as hiring a thief
as night watchman in a jewelry
store. Bunker is vicepresident
(at $60,000 per year) of the Leli
man Corporation. The Lehman
Corporatiqn holds stock in Alcoa.
Tliat made everything nice and
cozy. Bunker acted as Alcoa's
stooge within tlie government.
The Sen(ite investigating com
mittee revealed the following
facts:
1. Bunker still draws his 60
grand from (he Lehman .Corpora
tion, which in turn makes some
of its money from Alcoa.
2. After four months not a
shovelful of dirt has been turned
on the 600,000,000 pound alumi
num expansion program an
nounced by 0PM last May.
3. The first contract to be
signed under the program obli
gated the government to spend
$52,000,000 to finance new alumi
num plants but leaves Alcoa to
build therri and to operate them
when and how it pleases.
4. Under tue contract, after
Alcoa has permitted aluminum to
be produced in the government
pLant,. the ;f:o;vprnpiept cannot use
its qwjx products except" at a price
satisfactory to Alcoa.
5. No raw aluminum can be
turned over to other plants for
processing except on terms OK'd
by Alcoa.
The Aluminum trust, in other
word.s, wa.s far from "liquidated."
It was even able to extenS itb
power and influence. And all this
was possible because it succeeded
in placing a stooge in a key gov
ernment job.
Alcoa was less succeesrul in its
fight'With the seamen. The solid
arity of the seamen is what
turned the trick. It is a solidarity
that will not be broken by Alcoa,
or the Maritime Commission or
any of their agents or stooges.
Hazards to CreW"
In Persian Gulf
FROM A SEAMAN
ON MANEUVERS
IN THE ARMY
Fort Bragg, N. C.
Sept. 26, 1941.
Dear Brothers:
I heard on the radio that
you boys are on strike. I'm
on maneuvers here in S. C.
... I just made P.F.C., which
puts a stripe on each arm
and gives me a raise of $6.00
a iponth, rii
Just got your two papers.
Boys, I'rn right for you and I
wish you all the best luck in
the world.
I don't blame you for strik
ing, looking at all the ships
that are being sunk; The boys
sure are risking' their lives.
I'd give anything to be
walking that picket line with
• a sign on my back.
So long, and thanks for the
newspaper.
Steady as she goes.
SiU—Atlantic, 6577
BOARD'S ALTERNATE PROPOSAL
(
(The following is the text of the "alternative" recommendation
proposed hy the NDMB. It amounts to practieat government control
of labor.)
The dispute wliicli svas certified to the Board arose out of the
tieup of 23 ships in New York Harbor. The parties who were certl
fied involved those who were in that dispute, namely: some ship
owners afiiliated with the American Merchant Marine Institute, Inc.
other shipowners afllllated with the Pacific American Shipowners
Association, Waterman Steamship Corporation, Seafarers Interna
tional Union of America, rffil'ated with the American Federation oi
Labor, and Sailors Union of the Pacific, affiliated with the American
Federation of Labor. Because of the nature of the dispute, the certi
flcation did not' involve other important shipowners, unions affiliated
with the American Federation of Labor, unioas affiliated with the
Cogress of Industrial Organizations and independent unions. More
over, the dispute as presented related solely to questions of war
bonus, and did not cover the general collective bargaining'contracts,
most of which expired September 30, 1941. ' •
The shipowners stated that' in their view the problem was an
industry problem with ramifications affecting many companies and
unions not party to the dispute. They urged the importance of estab
liahlng a permanent stabilization program similar to that which
OFM has created in shipbuilding.
The two unions which were a party to the controversy sought
a decision on that particular issue. The Board explored this possi
bility and made tentative suggestions which would have resulted In
increases in monthly war bonuses and Suez pbrt, bonuses and which
would have provided a board for future adjustments. However, one
of the Unions took the position that all the shipowners, in addition
to raising the monthly bonus 33%%, ought to be required, to meet
tn each area the highest bonus arrangement which aby one ship
owner, whether or not a party to the dispute, is now paying. Thus,
that union's position as it developed was that tlie problem was
industrywide. "
In tills situation this Board malfes the recommendation:
1. The problem of war bonus and allied questions as well as
any questions which are not settled by collective bargaining in the
negotiations now being carried on by the sliipowncrs with any
union may, at the request of any party be referred to a commis
sion of three neutrals appointed by the President. Tliis Commis
sion shall bear in such manner as it deems appropriate, all in
terested parties and shall try to evolve an appropriate stabiliza
tion program including war bonuses, general wages, hours and
working conditions, and settlement of the present controversy.
The Commission shall report to the President.
2. Until the Commiesion has reported to the President, this Board
will hold the case on its docket. Thereafter,, if the parties cannot
agree on the application of the Commlsslou'a report, to .the present
disp ite, the Board shall make recommendatipns including the aetting
of an appropriate retroactive date. In the meantime the. parties ehall
continue to observe their promises to operate and man ships without
interruptions due to disagreements on war bonus and allied questions.
The S.S. Lafayette left 'New
York City bound for Iraq on
March 19. 1941. A .few days out,
several seamen raised a beef
aboard the ship because the
drinking water had gritty' sub
stance in it. The washing water
was contaminated with fuel oil
drops. The captain promised the
men that he would change the
drinking water upon arrival at
Capetown.
After reaching Capetown, and
anchoring for several hours, we
left for Mombassa without fresh
water. Fresh water finally was
taken on at Mombassa.
The first few days" after our ar
rival in the hot climate of the
Persian Gulf we could riot get
drinking water out of the gravity
tanks. The Chief Engineer told
the saloon pantryman to use sink
water for drinking. The saloon
pantryman consulted the steward ̂
who told him it was alright to
use this water since the Chief En
gineer had OK'd it. The crew and
the officers aboard ship werei
forced to use this water from the
double bottom tanks or die of
thirst in the Persian Gulf.
At times the temperature rose
to 135 degrees. "We were in Bas
rah about fifteen days. It is quite
possible that the dirty diseased
water from flie Euphrates River
was pumped into the double bot
tom tanks, because we reached $
Basrah with 50 tons of water®,
there. After leaving Basrah we
had 80 tons of water, having dis
charged cafgo from 6 a.m. to 8
p.m. daily.' Also we used the wa"
ter constantly and even had the
ship's laundry done aboard.
Most of the men took sick with
chilis, bolls, or dysentery. One
ordinary seaman was left In Co/
lumbo, Ceylon, with malaria of
the brain. Many were partially ill
throughout the trip. ^
The Captain and the Chief En ^
gineer used the lower bridge fro' S
quently for pistol practice during, |
the voyage, thus endiingering the
lives of the deck department un
necessarily. At one time when the
deck department used airham i
mers on the bridge, the Captain:
and the Chief Engineer were en
grossed in their target practice;
and it took quite a while before
the deck crew knew that the:
shooting was in progress, the
noise of the air hammers coVered I
up the noise df the shooting. ' j
When the S.S. Lafayette left :
Capetown the Captain ordered a
blackout on decks until her.ar, ,
rival in Bandar Shapur, Iran. He
thus deprived the crew of the pro
tection of the Amerlcap. Flag. The
British government requested this
action. A letter of complaint was
sent to Cordell Hull, Secretary of
State, about this action. X^is let
ter was properly signed by the
crew members.
Ships' crews in the future
hould request innoculations
against tropical fevers, a good
supply of lime juice, and mos r r
quite nets before going into t^ : /
hellish climates of the ̂ ,ed Sea
and the Persian Gulf.
Harry Hqschkovyjtz,..
Book No. 20911.
' I i1
Support H.R.5446
(Continued from Page: If '
,send in telegrams to Washing
ton, expressing their vigorous
approval of H.R. 5448. All
Branches and ships' crews
should wiro Representative O. 8.
Bland, Chairman of the House
Committee on Merchant ^Marina
and Fisheries, indicating their
stand in favor of this bill AT
ONCEf
J V •
http://www.pdfcompressor.org/buy.html
o
• iiM
• Wi
;4BERSJp^
OFFICIAL 0K6AN OF THE ATLANTIC AND GULF DISTRICT,
SEAFARERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA
=i.
VOL, III MO NEW YORK, N. Y., FRIDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1941 No. 20
BOOST BONUS TO $80; $100 FOR SUEZ
Marine Cooks
Revolt; Appeal
To NMU Ran1(S
SAN PEDRO,—After de
feating the move to clamp
them into the stranglehold of
the top officialdom of the Na
tional Maritime Union by
defeating affiliation to the
NMU overwhelmingly in their
recent referendum, the mem
bership of the Marine Cooks
and Stewards of the Pacific
are now in open , revolt
against their own Communist
Partydominated officials and
taking steps for their recall
from office. At the same
l^e, the rank and file of the
Union stresses that it opposes
only the phoney "Unit^' of
Civran, Cayton and Co., but
desires to weld genuine bro;
therhood with the rank and
file of the N.M.U.
In the first issue of their new
paper, "VOTCTO OF THE MEM
BERSHIP", the Marine Cooks
carry an Open Letter to the NMU
Rank and File wnleh expresses
their genuine sentinient. The let
ter reads as follows:
. Letter to NMU Ranks
Sept. 12, 1941.
Dear Brothers:
We extend to you on this, our
first Issue, open greetings and
salutations. Now that we have
established a paper of, and for,
the rank and file mmebers of the
{Continued.on Page 2)
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
DEFENSE MEDIATION BOARD
The following is the official report of the recommendations
made by the National Defense Mediation Board in the bonus beef.
At special meetings this week, the membership of the Seafarers'
International Union up and down the coast is voting on these
recommendations. The alterative proposal, submitted by the Board
as a sort of ULTIMATUM in case the recommendations listed be
low were not accepted, is printed elsewhere in this issue under
the heading "BOARD'S ALTERNATE PROPOSAL."
• • • •
In the Matter of
AMERICAN MERCHANT MARINE INSTITUTE, INC.
rAClFTC AMERICAN SHIP OWNERS ASSOCIATION,
WATERMAN STEAMSHIP CORPORATION
SEAFARERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA
and
SAILORS' UNION OF THE PACIFIC — AFL.
The di*islon of the Board which heard this case was composed
of Charles E. WyzSnski, Jr., representing the public; George H.
Mead, representing employers, and Robert J. Watt, represeuting
employees.
Hearings were held on September 29 and on October 1, 2, 3
and 4, 1941.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Crews on American vessels sailing to foreign ports perform
an essential role in the national defense effort. Sound relationships
between representatives of these crews and owners of these vessels
are of great consequence to the nation.
2. The Seas Shipping Company, Inc., The Calmar Steamship
Corporation, the South Atlantic Steamship Company, and the Alcoa
Steamship Company, Inc., on the East Coast are associated jn the
American Merchant Marine Institute, Inc. Most of the owners on
the West Coast are associated in the Pacific American Shipowners
Association. The Waterman Steamship Corporation is not affiliated
with either group.
3. The unlicensed personnel before the National Defense Media
tion Board are represented by Seatarers' International Union of
North America and Sailors Union of Pacific.
(The licensed personnel are represented fy other unions. Their
problem is not dealt with here.)
4. Collective bargaining relationships have been established by
most of these owners with one or the other of these unions. In most
cases, collective bargaining contracts now exist or have just ex
pired. For the negotiation of such general contracts the parties
have worked out among themselves appppriate methods. These
methods usually include the parties requesting the United States
Department of Labor to station a Commissioner of Conciliation as
(Continued on Page 4)
Buchanan Crew Tells How
• Nazis Bombed Ship at Suez
Suppressed by the censors and up to the present unmen.
tioned in the daily press of this country is the dramatic story
of t/je bottibing by Nazi raiders of the S.S. PRESIDENT
BUCHANAN, manned by a Sailors Union of the Pecific crew.
A firsthand account of this attack and the dangers and
hardships Undergone by'the seamen of the BUCHANAN was
obtained only this week by the" Seafarer' Log from crew
members as the ship docked in New York.
The only previous mention
of the jaid on the BUOHA
• NAN was a reference in a re
cent issue of the American
Magazine. The rest of the
publications, including the
daily newspapers, saw fit to
leave unpublished this piece
of news vital to the seamen
out to get a just increase in
the war bonus.
Just Spectators
Here is the story as told to us
by sever/il members of the BU
CKANAN S crew.
".We ^rived . iu. Sues on Tues
day, July 8th and were lying at
anchor near Attica, near the Army
camp on the furthest end of the
bay. We experienced several air
raids after our arrival, in which
we just looke'd on more or less as
spectators, watching bombs fall
on the canal and on Port Tuflk
and the sputtering reply of anti
aircraft guns shooting at targets
sought out by a powerful display
of searchlights in the sky.
First Jolt
"On Sunday evening, July 13th,
with most of the crew aboard,
air raid sirens shrieked a warn
(Continitea on Page 3)
MASS LAUNCHING
OF NEW SHIPS
The greatest mass launching in
recent years oecured on Septem
ber 27th when fourteen vessels
slid off the ways in east and west
eoaet shipyards. The mass launch
ings brought the number of ships
built under the auspices of the
Maritime Commission to a total
of 104.
Among the ships launched was
the S.S. Alcoa Polaris, which will
be manned by a SIU crew.
SUPPORT FROM SEA
^
NDMI^ imposes Compromise;
Union Forced to Accept Under
fhreat of New Ultimatum
Faced with a virtual ultimatum to accept a
compromise on the bonus issue or else be sub
jected to an attack against the Union's existence
by an array of opponents including the highest
Government agencies and officials, representa
tives of the Seafarers' International Union
agreed this week to submit to the membersliip
recommendations of the National Defense Medi
ation Board for acceptance.
DEMANDS AND CONCESSIONS
Although they grant a 33V3% increase in the bonus, and
other concessions to the S.I.U., the recommendations do not
include a bonus for the West Indies or other Caribbean runs,
which the Union had among its chief demands. The increases
granted are far from satisfactory to the seamen. No increase
in war risk insurance is included. In addition, the recom
mendations include a stipulation that present arrangements
are to remain in force for one year and that during this
time all disputes are to he submitted to conciliation and
mediation machinery set up by the Government, without the
Union resorting to strike action on the bonus question.
On the panel which handed
down these recommendations
and the "alternative" was
Robert J. AVatt, a leader of
the American Federation of
Labor, who together with the
two other Board members,
urged acceptance "in the in
terests of National Defense."
What the S.I.U. Won
Although the decision of the
Board is far from a complete vic
tory for the Union, the SIU has
won a number of rounds in this
battle.
1. The finlcy Maritime Commis
sion remains out of the picture in
all disputes on this issue, present
or future. That is a terrible blow
to the shipowners and their tools
and a permanent' gain for the
Union.
Phoney Schemes Blasted
2. The shipoumers' vicious
scheme of tying the uar bonus
to the hull insurance rate—a
scheme which would have made
honue raises virtually impossible,
since hull rates as a whole fluc-
tuate but little—has been com-
Support H.R.5446
Bill for Seamen's
Jobless Insurance
While In Washington for the
Bonus Beef hearings, S.I.U. and
S.U.P. representatives also ap
peared before the House Com
mittee on Merchant Marine and
Fisheries to support H.R. 5446, a
bill to give unemployment insur
ance to m^ercharit seamen, who
have been excluded from sue*
government benefits up to the
present. Brothers Lundeberg
and Hawk spoke at length and
urged passage of the bill, which
would end this discrimination
against the men who sail the
ships.
rh his report to the member
ship, SecretaryTreasurer Hawk
has urged the membership to
(Uontinued on Page 4)
The sentiment of the S.I.U.
crews on the high seas could not
be polled during the bonus beef.
But how they felt is indicated by
the following cable received in
the Union office on OCTOBER 4,
1941 from the boys on the S.S.
Shickshinny:
SANSORIGINE NIL NIL
DLT HAWKS SEAFARERS
INTERNATIONAL UNION
NEW YORK CITY
WE HAVE FULL KNOWL
EDGE OF MEMBERSHIPS EF
FORTS AND ARE BEHIND
YOU ONE HUNDRED PER
CENT. IF POSSIBLE WIRE
COLLECT RESULTS.
PHILIPS
FOR CREW SHICKSHINNY
Unfortunately, we couldn't wire
them the results since the loca
tion of the ship in the cable is
given as "SANSORIGINE NIL
NIL", which in cable language
means: "The place and date the
cable was sent from can't be
given because of censorship."
But their feelings were un
doubtedly shared by all the
S.I.U. iVien on the high seas,
whom censorship did not prevent
from hearing of our, beef.
(Continued on Page 2)
Money Due
CREW OF S.S.
ALCOA BANNER
Ail members of the crew of
the S.S. Alcoa Banner, who
were paid off in New York
after the last trip in Septem
ber, are entitled to money due
them on the Explosive Bonus.
This money can be collected
by each seaman upon identifi
cation at the company offices,
17 Battery Place, N. Y.
t A
,1
f'S:
r
' f
• P
http://www.pdfcompressor.org/buy.html
E.r ';.>'^,;7^'.3*.
TJH E SEAFARERS' LOG Erid^y, October ]ifl, 1941
I .'.
=s:'
I S
I''' "•
' i..
r^,
W
I!:
«• ;'
Published by tne
ATLANTIC & GllLF WSTMCT
' ' of the
Seqfarers* intemqtiqnal Union
of North Americd
Affiliated with the American Federation of Labor
HARRY LUNDEBERQ, Acting International President
110 Market Street, Room 402, San Francisco, Calif.
V I . r
ADDREaa ALL CORRESPONDENCE CONCERNING THIS
T PUBLICATION TO:
"THE SEAFARERS' LOG" ^
P. O. Box 25, Station P, New York, N. Y.
Phone: BOwIing Green 93437
Defense Board Decision;
5 A Raw Deal
If. •
Tt would be just fooling ourselves to stress the gains con
ceded to tlie ITiiibn by the Xational Defense Mediation Board
decision in the bonus beef — to say that the Seafarer's' In
ternational Union has come out of the Board hearings with
a'big victory.
Gains there were, to he sure. After the militant and tena
cious fight made by the seamen against the shipowners and
the finky Maritime Comiuissioii during the strike, tlie De
fense Board would have been hardput not to make the num
ber of eoneoHsions it did make The seamen won them in the
first round of a battle ni which they fought unflinchingly.
A DANGEROUS tREND
But the concessions that' Mere refused the S.I.U. by the
Board and the manner in Avhich the Board's panel neted in
the case are cauSe for grave Concefii arid Serious reflection
to all unionconscious seamen.
The seamen fought the Maritime"Commission to a stand
still. Involved in that fight as a foremost i.ssue was the ques
tion of a war bonus for the Carrihean or West Indies run.
Most affected in thii^ question was the Alcoa Steamship Com
pany, the shipping subsidiary of the poAverful Aluminum
monopoly.
The Commission Avent to the extent of. open ami undis
guised scabherding in order to protect Alcoa from the S.T.U.
demand. The S.I.U. stood its ground ami the Commission
passed out of the picture. • '
The dispute then goes to the Defense Board and this sec^
ond government agency is no less a'starincli defender of
Alcoa against the seamen than the Commission Avas! The
N.D.M.B. also refuses to graut a bonus in the West Indies
run! It refuses this demand and dbesn't eA^en bother t'o ex
plain Avhy!
After such an experience, the seamen have not only the
right but the duty to Avonder Avho it is that is running the
government. We knoAV that "Banana" Eobson runs a vital
section of the Maritime Commission. Does Alcoa, do the
monOpolist.s, run the other vital machinery in all the other
government agencies? What has become of what A\'as oiice
proclaimed as a government of the people, by the people and
for the people?
WHO PROTECTS LABOR?
Another thing that puzzles the seamen and that they have
a right to be concerned about^ On the panel Avhieh handled
tlie di.spiite. Avhich Ava's so solicitous about Alcoa not having
to pay a West Iridies bonus. Avhich Avas so tough in threaten
ing the .seamen with compulsorj' arbitration, sat Robert J.
Watt, a leader of the American Federation of Labor, arid
presumably Labor's representative on the board. HOAV could
a man like that go along Avith such moves that clearly take
the side of the employers? Does the American Federation
of Labor approve such a .stand on the paft of one of its oilt
'stariding representatives? Isn't it the job of an A.F' of L.
'?man'to see to it that Labor's side is given a fair chance on
i;hese government bodies? Does a pledge to support ,"Na
tional Defense" mean that the defense of Labor's rights has
to go by the AVay.shle ?
These are questions that the seamen must necessarily ask
'them.selves as a re.sult of their experiences in the bonus beef.
The S.I.U., faced with government threats arid with the lack
of cooperation from Labor's representative on the Board, had
no choice but to accept the urisatisfactbry recommendations
of the N.D.M.B. ^
It AA^as siMiply a matter of pre.serving the Union intact. It
.was simply a matter of taking a few gains in order to build
• the txrganizatiom"stronger for the future. • '
But/In brilldirig 'for the future, the seamen will not fbr
i^et the e'kpe'rieneb's of this beef. They will have to take into
abcoiirit, the lessons learned in this dispute knd make use
..them for future refeceriCC. ' ' '
V
Marine Cooks
Revolt;
XP
T» <NMtf Ranks
(Continued from Page 1)
West Coast Marine Cooks and
Stewards it will not'be difficult
for us to speak to you openly and
frankly.
The Afflliation Ballot that ends
today will andoubtetlly express
the desire of the greater majority
of ourmembers to remain inde
pendent of the National Maritime
Union. This, brothers, IS riot to
be interpreted as an insult to you
as Union men. Our position on
the question of affiliation is inde
pendent' of our opinion of you,
the rank and file of another
mhritime union.
Continued Support
In the' past AVe have' supported
your every struggle to organize,
giving you economic arid moral
support in your 1936 strike and
every cooperation in what Ave all
considered important legislative
activity. Those of you Avho came
to the West Coast to ship out
found lis extremeiy cooyemtlve
and only in cases where your
worst element disrupted our ships
did we find disciplinary action
necessary.
But you have permitted to rise
in your organization a p61itical
group that has acquired a stran
glehold on the NMU. Although
this group has contributed noth
ing to the militancy of your or
ganizapon, but on the contrary
committed you to a jiollcy of ap
peasing the shipowners and the
government on the most vital is
sues, nevertheless through plan
ned maneuvers it was able to
take over the organizational con
trol of the NMU. It is this group,
In its desperate drive for com
plete cdntfdl over the entire
Maritime Industry; that has
driven us into the "unity" ballot,
The "linlty" they wish us to
accept is not the real working
class unity of Marili^e workers
but the ' top fraction organiza
tional unity of the East and West
Coast politicians. We, no friore
than you, Wish to be dominated
alnd shdVed around by your offi
cials either ln fighting for condi
tions or determining trade union
policy.'
Their "Unity"
Quite ftankly tHeir record for
militancy is lousy and we don't
trust them. Ybut PILOT, jiist
like our own VOICE of the Fed
eration is being used by these,
people to beceive and betray you
into even gieater cbndesstDns to
the shipowners. Arid the war
mongering policy of the editorial
staff will riiean ever greater sac
rlflceis drii'^brir Part, even as you
have sailed ships to Vladivostok
for onefifth of the bonus df the
other west coast upiions.
Join Against Misleaders .
We could list' the innumerable
reasons why it Is necessary for
"both of us as maritime workers
to effect a clekr and effective
struggle against the reactionary
character of out leadership, their
rirdgrahi krid flleffr activity. Suf
fice If *to Hay that it 1s this
qUeBtibn of leadership that makes
Unity irii'iiosfeiblie for both Coasts.
It is tWfs qile^tlon rif leadership
that has kept yodr 'cdridftions eo
much lower than ouiri • arid pre
vented ycm from building your
union to the level of economic
coriditlons and onion 'militancy
that we have been able to achieve.
And even our own conditions
hav'e suffered for the last three
years because of the appeasing
"this is not the time" slogan of
fifEMMB Iniposes CQmprorriise;
{Continued from Page 1)
pletely defeated, iChe system of
bonus payriients Is ̂ d femalris on
a flat rate' basis.
3. The attempt of the shipown
ers to base bonus pay on a per
centage of toages—a "solution'
which they sold ta the licensed
riersonnel and which would have
the effect of breaking the solid
arity of the unlicensed rating on
this isaiie^bas similarly been
scotched^ Equal bonus pay, on a
flat rate, is to be paid each sea
man, whether he be bosun, ordin
ary, oiler, wiper, or messman,
, No "Freezing"
4. The shipowners' plan to
"frbeze" bonus pay for the dura
tion of the war has fizzled. Tlie
Board's decision specificaily rec
ognizes that the Union has the
right to ask for renewed increases
in bonus pay "if the present
situation is changed by an Act of
Congress, executive action, the
spfiead or contraction of the area
of hostilities . . . or the rise or
fan of sinkings of American ves
sels. .. ."
5. Mediation machinery has
been set up which eliminates the
pbssibilitiy of such delays as the
five months lost since last May
and the schemes of the shipown
ers to hamstring tiie Uriioii with
compulsory arbitration. Under the
Board recommendations, if after
five days after the Union gives
the companies written notice of a
d'eriiarid fot increased bonus pay,
an agreement has riot been
reached, the matter can immedi
ately be presented to the Division
of Conciliation of the U.S. De
partment of Labor. "If concilia
tion is not successful in one week
. . . the Director of the Division
may then refer the case to a
board composed of throe disinter
ested persons appointed by the
President of the United States,"
says the N.D.M.B. decision. Such
board shall have power to make
recommendations."
Retroactive Bonus
6. The increase in bonus pay—
from $60 to $80 per month and
froih $75 to $100 (plus $5 addi
tional for eacli day over five) for
the Port' of Suez—is effective on ̂
all ships as of August 16, 1041 at
the latest "or any earlier effective
date set by special rider.'* In
otiier words, the new bonus gains
are retroactive.
7. Most important, the ship-
dtvhers' dastardly conspiracy to
break ALL CONTRACTS with the
Union, on the fiimsy pretext that
the Union violated its agreement
when it refused to go in for ar-
bitration, has been squashed once
and for all. "Nothing in these
recommendations," says .the
Board decision, "shall be' inter-
preted so as to reduce benefits noAV
existing under collective bargain-
ing contracts. "Except as herein
modified, existing contracts and
arrangements shall continue."
ThaPs 'not only a blow at the con-
spiring shipowiiers, but at the
trtacUerous officials of the ~Na*
tional Maritime Union, who ioere
conspiring with them and hoping
to move in on the SIU ships once
the contracts of the Union were
declared void.
Pacing the Pacts
The Seafarers Internatidnal
Union , has thus Won some'highly
important decisions in this strug
gle. The SIU does not go In for/
the .fancy lying of the Staliuist
dominated officials of the NMU,
who call every setback they get
a gain and every defeat a victory.
The SIU faces the facts and
judges tliem soberly. The bonus
dispute has resulted in a decisipn
from the Defense Board which
the Union has to accept because
it has no better choice, given the
present circumstances. It is not
a triumph for the Union: far^,
from It. But it ddes mean a few
more rounds won against the
shipbwnei's and their stooges. It
does Show that the SIU can stand
its groithd. That's the 'best giiar
antee that it will survive the diffi
cult times aliead and win more'
rounds for the seamen In the bat
tle, which is itself far fiUhi 'fin
ished, and which the Union—
looking confidentially into the fu
ture—knows that it. can and Will
win in good time.
Seafarers' Log Honor Roll
R. Lindsay .$ 2.00
S.«. IPSWICH 9.50
L. Daray 1.00
S.S. ALCOA
PATHFINDER 24.3b
Anbriymous 1.00
James Bingham ,50
J. P. Shuler .50
George' Allen ... 10.00
iS.S. DELSUD 21.50
Ed Travers / 2,00
D. Malone ... 2.00
S.S. LASSALL'E
(Engine Dept.) 2.00
S.S. PONCE DE LEON .. 8.60
S.S. SANDWICH ........ 19.00
T. Varhon ' i, 1.00
S.S. MONROE 10.45
Aritfioriy Melewski 2.00
A Member 3.00
S.S. WEST liyjBODEN .. 21.00
S.S, ALCOA StilPPER .. 8.40
j. Anderson '... " Uso
S.S. CITY OF ALMA .... 59.06
J. Ganzhorn 5.00
G. Whitehurst :, 1:00
S.S. TOPA TOPA , 430
R. Blades 1.00
Joseph Delmonaco i;00
C. Johnson 1.00
• S.S. EVELYN
(Deck Dept 2,50
William Wandell ....r... liflO
S.S. CARABULLA. .. .n . 'i 10.88
S.S. ALCOA CARRIERS.. .,7.(50
C. Pope .......;.., "J i;po
Donations from Sah Pedfo 23;00
S.S. HILTON 6.50
J. Samardje I.OO
S.S. DELPLATA ........ 48.65
E. LIndsey .....V . i.po
E. Folsom V i;6o
J. Linn . 1.00
S.S. LAFAYETTE ....... "2330
A. WitufskI ............, vrdjab
C. Jackson ^,.1.... , 6.00
Total .; r$3BZ88
our leadership.
DOT Pig^^
In t'liese "riext moriths and
yeats "rif iVar cfiSi,4 and labor
frtrrigglea ririity BetWean both
'coasts iriupt be the actual fight to
riiaititain cbririltiohs arid tiraserve
tlur mibns. "We do not trust' the
fffSse'rit leadership of the; Mari
time Uriioii to' coriduct that right
iesblilteiy Or' effectively, rihat
fight is ours, as the rank and flile
membership of both, unions; a
cause that Is Coriitriori to all work
ers, maritime and otherwise, When
their conditions: anri their organi
zations are under attack.
In the ever developing struggle
against the encroachment 'of "tho
shipowners and reactionary legis'
lation you will find us with yoiri
fighting every inch of the' wriy.
We pledge yori our wholehiear^d
• support iri every (jidonbriiic' biri'd
political fight . . . we pledge yott'
the hard earned militaricy thkt
lias come to us through the great
strikes of '34 and '36. " ^
In apite of our reactioriary
leadership w'e pledge yOu the
unity that only worker s whose
livelihood ih earned by the sweat,
and the effort of thfeir la'bor can
feel. TWat tinffy can .riever he
Voted on , . . thaj unity 'can ria'ver
be destroyed'. . •
• .i
* , I
http://www.pdfcompressor.org/buy.html
J!
Friday, October f6,1941 THE SEAFARERS' LOG
i
hat's Do i njg—«
V'
NEW ORLEANS
Dear Sir and Brother:
The Maritrhie Commission Is
complaining about us tying the
ships up, but from the way the
Germans are sinking the ships
going out, they should thank us
for keeping thein tied to'the
docks, and away from the Nazi
submarine.
Some day in some place, may
be sopn, maybe years from now,
we may get a newspaper to print
our side of the story. As we pick
up the papers today we see where
we are unpatriotic Americans,
communists, and other high
handed phrases the capitalist
owned press and Maritime Com
mission can think up. We see
where we are stabbing our fellow
Americans in the back because we
are tying up National Defense.
But yet we never see where we,
the seamen, who risk Our lives to
keep other nations alive and give
them the things it takes to carry
on the war against the one who
really threatens us, get one bit of
praise or support from the paperfe
or any government agency.
This morning we see in the pa
pers and hear on the radio where
they have appropriated another 8
billion or so dollars for lease
lertd. Yes, brother, arodnd 8 bil
lion dollars for Eiifgland, France
and \vhat have you.' We, the sea
men are the ones that will have
to sail the ships that bring the
majority of the leaselend prod
Ucts to the .other countries. No,
brothers, not. the men who have
that money. They will never haVe
to leave their "dollarayear"
($25.00 a day expense) jobs to
sail these ships across the seas
and into the v.ar zones. They
have appropriated this money for
the other countries, but where is
the money for their own Ameri
can seamen who are out on strike
for a decent war bonus? No, bro
thers, not one led cent for us!
We don't rate it as far as theV
are concerned.
The M.C. made great plans,
how they would take every ship
the SItr struck and sail it with
iHhks. It made these plans and
threats and put it in the papers,
the same, papers the seamen
couldn't beg, borrow or steal a
column in, to give their side of
the story.
But yet with ali their plans and
false propaganda we won the first
inning.
Y'es, brothe..i, we have built a
damn gbdd ball team. We are win
ning out, playing against great
odd's, Mr. Shipowner & the M.C.
Let's keep our score high. Let's
prove to them that we mean busi
ness: prove to them that we
should come first, as American
Citizens and American Seamen.
Brothers, in closing I want to say,
that if we keep our chins up like
we did during the strike, we
can't' lose.
Fraternally yours,
C. J. ''Buck" Stephens,
New Orleans, Engine, Pat.
PROVIDENCE
I'he following is a letter in re-
ply to an anti-labor blast in the
employer-run press.
Sept. 25, 1941.
Editor
Pawtucket Times
Pawtucket, R. I.
Dear Sir:
In your editorial published in
the September 24th issue of the
Pawtucket Times you state that
the strike calied by the Seafarars'
International Union "An unjus
tified strike because it is a strike
against the public safety," You
refer to the bonus asked by the
Seafarers' International' Union
for sliips' crews entering war
zones.
A • an Editor, Sir, will you
kindly explain to me and the pub
lic your experience and qualifica
tions as a seafarer? Do you ap
preciate the hazards and hard
ships that a member of the S.I.U
undergoes, as well as the worry
and uncertainty of the members
of his family whom he leaves be
hind, when he performs his duties
in these troubled times? As yoii
know, several American ships
have already been sunk and even
Wins Right fo
The Aluminum Company of. America is out to defend its
glutted hankroll, hot only against seamen who ask a decent
wage for sailing its .ships, but also against the United States
Government who, since 1937, has been trying to break the
monopoly's dpathrgrip upon the country'.s supply of alu
minum. ^ ~
ti
Alcoa lost its first round to the
seanien (when its stooge Mari
time Commission 'Was eliniinated
from bonus hegotiatlons), but
thib Week it/Won the first round
of its fiflht with the government.
Federal Judge Francis G. Coffey
'rehderecf a decision which de
fied, In, all eesen'^tlar 'reflects,
the four and oneha f Vear did
government suit to break up the
Atuminum trust, uiider fhe Sher
W.n.ant'4r,d8t'iaWs.
Judge Coffey's involved and le
.galistic reasoning will permU iVl
qoa to continue to corner all raW
Materials and plantfacilities fhr'
thp production of the yaluablei
metal, if will continue to set;
prices, arid conditions of sale apdi
prevent expansion of productoin
facilities by competitors, In .short,
Alpoa will be able to continue its'
selfseeking sabotage of "defense"
efforts by restricting the amount
of aluminum produced for the
building of war planes.
Even as fhe longwinded Judge
began a three day reading of his
opinion, a Senate investigating
committee in Washington was un
covering additional hairraising
facts dn Alcoa's antidemocratic
maneuvers. .
As usual, these reyelatldns
were ignored by the eniployer-
dpminated press ( Alcoa does a lot
of advertising), But The Nation,
a liberal weeltly magazine Which
does not depend upon advertising
for its existence, did publish a
story written hr I. P. Stone. "The
(Continued on Page 4)
the most romantic optimist could
not dare hope that more ships
will not be sunk. It is fortunate,
"fndeed, that up to the present, no
American lives have been lost.
Your attempt to belittle our claim
on the ground that the West In
dies waters have not been de
clared by our Government Iq be
a part of the war zone yet. Your
article refers to "waters in which
there may be some risk even
though they are not actually in
eluded in the area defined as war
zones." What do you call being
torpedoed—just going for a swim?
Is there no risk in being sunk
and put adrift in a. lifeboat for
God knows how many days, with
possibly no chance of taking food
and water in the lifeboat with
you? Then what is your idea pf
risk?
You say that the United States
Maritime Commission has been
ready^ to engage in, a study of
war bonus? Why have they then
repeatedly told the steamship
companies not to give a war bo
HUB? The "Maritime Commission
has never, at any time, been
ready to aid or help the unions
in any trouble, be it on condi
tions of better living or workin
conditions, in other than its own
selfish way, of doing business.
It is true that our President
did not declare the West Indies
a war zone, but sea "raiders know
no boundaries. Af the same time
the issue is not confined to the
waters of the West Indies. Con
sider those ships entering the
ports of British Africa and the
Red Sea. Such ships may easily
becume the piey uf raiders.
You further state that' tire
union leader's were not willing to
wait—in Other words, not to
strike. We, in the S.I.U. gave the
steamship owners plenty of tinie
to meet our demands. But' no.
They would not listen to arty de
mand in reason from us. But the
Maritime Commission and the
shipowners did meet behind
closed doors with the licensed offi
cers of the deck and engine de
partments and granted their de
mands, disregarding the S.I.U.,
which is the representative of the
seamen in general. These sea
men, who really carry the brunt
of the work, were left out in the
cold. However, the. latest informa
tion to come to the attention of.
this office in Providence, is that
.the matter has been taken from,
the hands of the Maritime Com
mission and that the bonus dis
pute has been certified to the Na
tional Defense Mediation . Board
by the Secretary of Labor inline
with President Roosevelt's Proc
lamation of May 27, 1941.
Now, Mr. Editor, I hope that
you will please let the public iu
general see this letter and just
read what the score really is on
this war bonus strike.
'•
. SEAFARERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION' :
OF NORTH AMERICA ^
Atlantic & Gulf District |
/ i
SecretaryTreasurer's Office
Room 213 — 2 Stone Street, New York City
P. O. Box 25, Station P Phone: BOwling Green 93437
DIRECTORY OF BRANCHES
BRANCH
NEW YORK
BOSTON
PROVIDENCE .
BAGTIMORB ..
PHILADELPHIA
NORFOLK
NEW ORLEANS
SAVANNAH ...
JACKSONVILLE
TAMPA
MOBILE
TEXAS CITY ..
MIAMI
SAN JUAN
ADDRESS
,.2 Stone St.
Dispatcher's OfiBee .,
. 330 Atlantic Ave. ...
. 465 South Main St. .
. 14 North Gay St. ..,
,6 North 6th St
. 25 Commercial PI. ..
309 Chartres St. ....
. 218 East Bay St. ...,
.136 East Bay St. ....
. 206 So. Franklin St. ,
. 56 So. Conception St.
. 105 4th St., N.
.1348 N.E. First Ave..
. 8 Covadonga St
PHONE
BOwling Green 93437
BOwling Green 93430
LIBerty 4057
Manning 3572
Calvert 4539
Lombard 7651
Norfolk 41083
MAgnolia 3962
Savannah 31728
Jacksonville 61791
Tampa M1323
Dexter 1449
Texas City 722
Miami 22950
San Juan 1886
Buchanan Crew TeHs Mow
Nazis Bombed Ship at Suez
Sincerely yours,
Joseph E. Lgpham,
Providence Agent of the
Seafarers' Int. Uhloin
NOTICE!
EDWARp DUPUY
• Please get in tpucii wjth
I,iOcal Board No. 14,
New Orleans, La.
A. A. SAULS, G223
Get in touch with" your a^nt
Mrs. W. M, Sauls, Bpx 114,
Ridgeland, S.C., immediately.
(Continued from Page 1)
ing. Most of the seamen aboard
the BUCHANAN were asleep in
their bunks and didn't pay
much attention to it. Suddenly,
at 2 o'clock in the morning, I
was shaken in my own bunk and
the ship seemed to have under
gone a severe shock.
"We rushed out on deck to find
out what was the matter. The
first thing we heard was the pop
ping off of a tug tied to the stern
of the ship. The native long
shoremen were rushing around in
all directions, jumping into
barges and doing their best to get
clear of the ship in a hurry.
Under Fire
"We discovered that a bomb
had landed a few feet astern of
the ship, which had caused the
percussion we felt in the foc'si.
Most of the crew assembled
around the square of the prome
nade deck outside the sailors'
quarters. We could no longer re
tain the calm bearing of mere
onlookers. We felt that wi were
under fire. I don't hesitate to
say that my heart was practical
ly in my throat at that moment.
All of the crew had similar feel
ings.
Another Blast
"While we were discussing this
first blast, in the excitement we
suddenly heard the roar of a plane
diving for the ship and soon the
shrill whistle of a .falling bomb
followed. We made for the alley
ways leading to our quarters in
an attempt to get off the open
deck. With a sigh of relief we
heard a bomb detonating in the
water about 20 yards on the port
side.
"Once again, this time cau
tiously we came out in the open
square to see what had happen
ed. There, across the bay, we
saw a hiigc burst of flame shoot
ing up from the deck of a ship.
S,S, Georgic Ablazed
"A Soldier nearby shouted ex
citedly; 'What's I'he position of
the GEORGIC!' The next day we
found out that it was the 28,000
ton S.S. Georgic, but Ive never
couldf' discover how many people
had been killed In the raid. We
watched her for a while and saw
her blazing hulk being towed
through the water to get her out
of reach of otlier ships.
"After this incident we needed
no further convincing as to our
ships being aiftually subject to de
struction by the Axis raiders.
Third Bombing
"As we were watching the
GEORGIC In her agony of fire.
the plane zoomed down upon us
again and we rushed for cover
once more. Another bomb went
off in a deafening loar, this time
on the starboard side. We waited
up for a while and when we heard
the sound of the 'AllClear' sig
nal. we went back to sleep.
Damage Surveyed
"The next morning we sur
veyed the damage. The sanitary
lines were broken down. Pipes
and pumps were out of order.
Several of the radiators had been
torn from the wall. The concus
sion from the first bomb had
ripped off a ventilator on the
poop deck. Two longshoremen
had been killed as they Jumped
off the ship to seek safety. The
remaining longshoremen had left
the ship and taken to the hills
where they dwell. Cargo was
not being worked.
Lack of Precautions
"We attributed the attack to
the fact that the BUCHANAN, be
ing a former passenger sliip, liad
its huge midship houses painted
white which showed up as a per
fect target in the moonlight.
Nevertheless, even after this at
tack, although tlie midship houses
were covered with canvas as a
measure of precaution, a barge
full of white floursacks was tied
up alongside jof us, making us as
much of a target as before.
"Two other Amerioan ships
were close by. One was the S;S.
Montanan, also manned by an
SUP Crew and the S.S. Knoxville
City, an Isthmian Line ship. Tliey
were sparea our experience, but
tlie Montanan got a warm recep
tion, as if had just arrived.
Back Bonus Beef
"The next few days, before we
pulled out, were days in which
we lived in expectancy of further
bombings. The port was in the
grip of tetuor."
When asked how the BUCHA
NAN boys felt about the war
bonus, they declared:
"After this trip, we feel that
they value our lives damn cheap
if they think that $60 a month
and $75 for e^atry ir»to Suez, can
even begin to compensate sea
men for putting up with tKe
Nazi bombings, let alone all the
other untold hardships that we
have to go through on a trip like
this. You can be sure that we
were all behind your strike 100
per cent. We're ready to back
the demands for higher bonds
and war risk insurance to the
lir it, And Vwe'ye flot this horri
ble experience in Suez to back
us up in this just demand."
I ^1
• j.
B
iy.
' 1
i V:. 1
'"ii
tsl
I r "• * J
11
• A
.['.J''.'
•
http://www.pdfcompressor.org/buy.html
• .;'v FWr
. •
• Jpfev • • •
f;F,F
y •
• ,'F^' <• .
"lijiji 4.
THE SEAFARERS' LOG
' '''^ Vli Friday, October 10. 1941
HQBE ABOUT;
RECOMMENDATIGNS OF THE
DEFENSE MEDIATION SOARD
{Continued from Page 1)
an observer and mediator at the collective bargaining negotiations.
These recommendations do not affect those methods or any unex
pired contracts.
5. However, a special problem arises From the risk run by men
"Who go to sea in time of war. This problem has not been solved
by the existing or contemplated contracts. It is with this problem
that these recommendations are concerned.
6. The first pait of this problem is to provide for bonuses for
war risk which will be fair under present conditions, The second
part of this problem is to provide machinery for making equitable
future adjustments if conditions change.
7. To meet the first part of the problem, the National Defense
Mediation Board recommends that until changed, as provided in
paragraph 8. the following war bonus rules shall govern those who
become signatory to these recommendations:
a. There shall be five war risk areas, namely:
1. TransAtlantic voyages to Spain, Portugal; East, South or West
Coasts of Africa, Red Sea, Persian Gulf, India, Iceland and Green
land. (Whole voyage; except that if any vessel continues east
bound to United States ports via India and the Pacific Ocean said
bonus rates for such area will continue until the vessel passes
the 180th Meridian, eastbound, and thereafter no further bonuses
will be payable.)
2. TransAtlantic voyages to Russia (Archangel, etc.) (Whole
voyage)
3. TransPacific voyages to Japan, Philippine Islands, China, Indo
China, East Indies, Malayan Peninsula. (After crossing the J80th
Meridian westbound, until recrossing the same Meridian east
bound.)
4. TransPacific voyages to New Zealand or Australia. (From ar
rival of vessel in Suva or the crossing of the 180th Meridian,
westbound, until departure from Suva or crossing the 180th
Meridian eastbound.)
5. Canada (Atlantic Coast.) (While vessel is north of 35 degrees
of north latitude when bound to or from a Canadian port.)
b. An ablebodied seaman shall be paid a war risk bonus at the
rate of $80 a month in the first four areas and $33 in the fifth area.
Other unlicensed personnel shall be paid the same bonus.
c. There shall be paid to ablebodied seamen in addition to the
area bonus just provided, the following port bonuses:
1. For the port of Suez, or any other port which is subject to regu
lar bombing, $100, plus $5 per day for each day beydnd five days
that the vessel is in that port.
:2. For any port Jn the Red Sea or in the Persian Gulf not covered
by paragraph (1) Supra. $45.The same bonuses shall be paid
other unlicensed personnel. The Board makes no recommendation
as to port bonuses for Vladivostok or ports in Iceland.
8. To meet the second part of the problem, the National De
fense Mediation Board recommends that the following machinery
for making equitable future adjustments shall govern those who
become signatory to these recommendations:
a. Any signatory may ask for a change, an addition to, or sub
traction from the present war bonus rules set forth above if the
present situation is changed by an act of Congress, executive action,
the spread or contraction of the area of hostilities in the Eastern
pr Western hemispheres, the entry into the war or withdrawal from
the war of belligerents, or the rise or fall of sinkings of American
vessels. Such proposed change shall be limited to the areas where
conditions are alleged to have changed.
b. The signatory asking for the change shall present his request
In writing to the party from whom the change is sought. (Meetings
shall occur at once.) If agreement betweeq them is not reached
one week after the request is presented, either party may present the
matter to the United States Department of Labor Division of Con
ciliation for conciliation. If conciliation is not successful in one week
after the matter was presented to the Division of Conciliation, the
Director of the Division may then refer the case to a board composed
of three disinterested persons to be appointed by the President of
The United States. Such Board shall have power to make recommen
^iations.
9. The recommendations in paragraph (8) shall be effective until
November 1, 1943. I'aragraph (7) shall be effective until November
1, 1.942, During the period of these recommendations there shall be
in connection with and on account of war bonus issues, no lockout,
slowdown, or like action by either owners or men represented by
• fSose who become signatdrfea to these recommendations.
10. Nothing in these recommendations shall be Interpreted so
as to reduce benefits now existing under collective bargaining con
tracts. Except as herein modified existing contracts and arrangements
shall continue.
1. These recommendations shall become effective upon all ships
which sailed on or before August 16, 1941 or any earlier effective
date set by special rider. i
12. If any dispute arises as to the interpretation of these recom
mendations, and if the parties cannot adjust that dispute by collec
tive bargaining, either party may refer it to the Division of Con
ciliation for conciliation, and, if conciliation fails, either party may
refer it' to the threeman board referred to in paragraph (8) for
;lnterpretation.
NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDIATION BOARD
By Cliarles B. Wyzanski, Jr., George H. Mead, Roberb J. Watt
The representatives of the Seafarers' International Union of
North America, Atlantic and Gulf District, though not fully In ac
cord with the recommendations, agree to carry back these recom
mendations to the Union's membership and to explain to the mem
• bership the circumstances as to why it is to the Union's interest
to accept these recommendations and explain to them their respon
sibility in connection with these recommendations.
SEAFARERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OP NORTH AMERipA
«y John Hawk. M. D. Biggs, Howard Guinier, Sydney Gretcher
More About r
Alcoa Privileged
To Sabotage
(Continued from Page 3)
title of Stone's article was "Mak
ing Defense Safe for Alcqp."
The government had long
planned to expand aluminum pro
duction by Federal financing of
plant facilities. This program was
entrusted to one of those phoney
"$peryear" men, and Stone re
veals how he did the job up
brown!
Arthur h. Bunker, of 0PM, was
the man given the task of battling
the Aluminum trust. This was
about as sensible as hiring a thief
as night watchman in a jewelry
store. Bunker is vicepresident
(at $60,000 per year) of the Leli
man Corporation. The Lehman
Corporatiqn holds stock in Alcoa.
Tliat made everything nice and
cozy. Bunker acted as Alcoa's
stooge within tlie government.
The Sen(ite investigating com
mittee revealed the following
facts:
1. Bunker still draws his 60
grand from (he Lehman .Corpora
tion, which in turn makes some
of its money from Alcoa.
2. After four months not a
shovelful of dirt has been turned
on the 600,000,000 pound alumi
num expansion program an
nounced by 0PM last May.
3. The first contract to be
signed under the program obli
gated the government to spend
$52,000,000 to finance new alumi
num plants but leaves Alcoa to
build therri and to operate them
when and how it pleases.
4. Under tue contract, after
Alcoa has permitted aluminum to
be produced in the government
pLant,. the ;f:o;vprnpiept cannot use
its qwjx products except" at a price
satisfactory to Alcoa.
5. No raw aluminum can be
turned over to other plants for
processing except on terms OK'd
by Alcoa.
The Aluminum trust, in other
word.s, wa.s far from "liquidated."
It was even able to extenS itb
power and influence. And all this
was possible because it succeeded
in placing a stooge in a key gov
ernment job.
Alcoa was less succeesrul in its
fight'With the seamen. The solid
arity of the seamen is what
turned the trick. It is a solidarity
that will not be broken by Alcoa,
or the Maritime Commission or
any of their agents or stooges.
Hazards to CreW"
In Persian Gulf
FROM A SEAMAN
ON MANEUVERS
IN THE ARMY
Fort Bragg, N. C.
Sept. 26, 1941.
Dear Brothers:
I heard on the radio that
you boys are on strike. I'm
on maneuvers here in S. C.
... I just made P.F.C., which
puts a stripe on each arm
and gives me a raise of $6.00
a iponth, rii
Just got your two papers.
Boys, I'rn right for you and I
wish you all the best luck in
the world.
I don't blame you for strik
ing, looking at all the ships
that are being sunk; The boys
sure are risking' their lives.
I'd give anything to be
walking that picket line with
• a sign on my back.
So long, and thanks for the
newspaper.
Steady as she goes.
SiU—Atlantic, 6577
BOARD'S ALTERNATE PROPOSAL
(
(The following is the text of the "alternative" recommendation
proposed hy the NDMB. It amounts to practieat government control
of labor.)
The dispute wliicli svas certified to the Board arose out of the
tieup of 23 ships in New York Harbor. The parties who were certl
fied involved those who were in that dispute, namely: some ship
owners afiiliated with the American Merchant Marine Institute, Inc.
other shipowners afllllated with the Pacific American Shipowners
Association, Waterman Steamship Corporation, Seafarers Interna
tional Union of America, rffil'ated with the American Federation oi
Labor, and Sailors Union of the Pacific, affiliated with the American
Federation of Labor. Because of the nature of the dispute, the certi
flcation did not' involve other important shipowners, unions affiliated
with the American Federation of Labor, unioas affiliated with the
Cogress of Industrial Organizations and independent unions. More
over, the dispute as presented related solely to questions of war
bonus, and did not cover the general collective bargaining'contracts,
most of which expired September 30, 1941. ' •
The shipowners stated that' in their view the problem was an
industry problem with ramifications affecting many companies and
unions not party to the dispute. They urged the importance of estab
liahlng a permanent stabilization program similar to that which
OFM has created in shipbuilding.
The two unions which were a party to the controversy sought
a decision on that particular issue. The Board explored this possi
bility and made tentative suggestions which would have resulted In
increases in monthly war bonuses and Suez pbrt, bonuses and which
would have provided a board for future adjustments. However, one
of the Unions took the position that all the shipowners, in addition
to raising the monthly bonus 33%%, ought to be required, to meet
tn each area the highest bonus arrangement which aby one ship
owner, whether or not a party to the dispute, is now paying. Thus,
that union's position as it developed was that tlie problem was
industrywide. "
In tills situation this Board malfes the recommendation:
1. The problem of war bonus and allied questions as well as
any questions which are not settled by collective bargaining in the
negotiations now being carried on by the sliipowncrs with any
union may, at the request of any party be referred to a commis
sion of three neutrals appointed by the President. Tliis Commis
sion shall bear in such manner as it deems appropriate, all in
terested parties and shall try to evolve an appropriate stabiliza
tion program including war bonuses, general wages, hours and
working conditions, and settlement of the present controversy.
The Commission shall report to the President.
2. Until the Commiesion has reported to the President, this Board
will hold the case on its docket. Thereafter,, if the parties cannot
agree on the application of the Commlsslou'a report, to .the present
disp ite, the Board shall make recommendatipns including the aetting
of an appropriate retroactive date. In the meantime the. parties ehall
continue to observe their promises to operate and man ships without
interruptions due to disagreements on war bonus and allied questions.
The S.S. Lafayette left 'New
York City bound for Iraq on
March 19. 1941. A .few days out,
several seamen raised a beef
aboard the ship because the
drinking water had gritty' sub
stance in it. The washing water
was contaminated with fuel oil
drops. The captain promised the
men that he would change the
drinking water upon arrival at
Capetown.
After reaching Capetown, and
anchoring for several hours, we
left for Mombassa without fresh
water. Fresh water finally was
taken on at Mombassa.
The first few days" after our ar
rival in the hot climate of the
Persian Gulf we could riot get
drinking water out of the gravity
tanks. The Chief Engineer told
the saloon pantryman to use sink
water for drinking. The saloon
pantryman consulted the steward ̂
who told him it was alright to
use this water since the Chief En
gineer had OK'd it. The crew and
the officers aboard ship werei
forced to use this water from the
double bottom tanks or die of
thirst in the Persian Gulf.
At times the temperature rose
to 135 degrees. "We were in Bas
rah about fifteen days. It is quite
possible that the dirty diseased
water from flie Euphrates River
was pumped into the double bot
tom tanks, because we reached $
Basrah with 50 tons of water®,
there. After leaving Basrah we
had 80 tons of water, having dis
charged cafgo from 6 a.m. to 8
p.m. daily.' Also we used the wa"
ter constantly and even had the
ship's laundry done aboard.
Most of the men took sick with
chilis, bolls, or dysentery. One
ordinary seaman was left In Co/
lumbo, Ceylon, with malaria of
the brain. Many were partially ill
throughout the trip. ^
The Captain and the Chief En ^
gineer used the lower bridge fro' S
quently for pistol practice during, |
the voyage, thus endiingering the
lives of the deck department un
necessarily. At one time when the
deck department used airham i
mers on the bridge, the Captain:
and the Chief Engineer were en
grossed in their target practice;
and it took quite a while before
the deck crew knew that the:
shooting was in progress, the
noise of the air hammers coVered I
up the noise df the shooting. ' j
When the S.S. Lafayette left :
Capetown the Captain ordered a
blackout on decks until her.ar, ,
rival in Bandar Shapur, Iran. He
thus deprived the crew of the pro
tection of the Amerlcap. Flag. The
British government requested this
action. A letter of complaint was
sent to Cordell Hull, Secretary of
State, about this action. X^is let
ter was properly signed by the
crew members.
Ships' crews in the future
hould request innoculations
against tropical fevers, a good
supply of lime juice, and mos r r
quite nets before going into t^ : /
hellish climates of the ̂ ,ed Sea
and the Persian Gulf.
Harry Hqschkovyjtz,..
Book No. 20911.
' I i1
Support H.R.5446
(Continued from Page: If '
,send in telegrams to Washing
ton, expressing their vigorous
approval of H.R. 5448. All
Branches and ships' crews
should wiro Representative O. 8.
Bland, Chairman of the House
Committee on Merchant ^Marina
and Fisheries, indicating their
stand in favor of this bill AT
ONCEf
J V •
http://www.pdfcompressor.org/buy.html